Shipper TMS Procurement: The 6 Metrics I’d Put in Every RFP

Shipper TMS Procurement: The 6 Metrics I’d Put in Every RFP
Shipper TMS procurement

Transport Management Systems (TMS) have moved from “nice-to-have” to critical infrastructure for European shippers. The problem is that most RFPs (Request for Proposal) still focus on feature checklists, rather than the metrics that actually determine value.

If you’re running TMS procurement for a mid-to-large manufacturer or retailer, here are six metrics I would always include in an RFP (after twelve years on both the shipper and logistics-provider side).


1. Carrier Connectivity Rate

How quickly and seamlessly can the TMS connect you to your carriers, and how many are already integrated?

  • Why it matters: A TMS without carrier coverage is a dashboard without data.
  • How to measure: % of your current carriers already live, average onboarding time for a new carrier.
  • Benchmarks: Best-in-class platforms can onboard new carriers in days, not months.

2. Time-to-Value (Implementation Speed)

Forget vague “implementation services.” What’s the real lead time until your team can book the first load?

  • Why it matters: European shippers often run procurement cycles under pressure. A 6–12 month rollout can already miss market shifts.
  • How to measure: Average time (in weeks) to go live for a mid-sized customer with 10–20 carriers.
  • Benchmarks: Agile cloud-native TMS players report 6–12 weeks vs legacy enterprise systems at 6–12 months.

3. User Adoption Rate

A TMS is only as good as the people using it. Adoption is a leading indicator for ROI.

  • Why it matters: Transport planners under time pressure will revert to email and Excel if the system isn’t intuitive.
  • How to measure: Post-implementation adoption (% of bookings actually made through the TMS), plus NPS/user satisfaction.
  • Benchmarks: Look for >80% adoption within the first year.

4. Process Automation Coverage

How much manual work is eliminated?

  • Why it matters: Every manual booking, track & trace call, or invoice check is cost leakage.
  • How to measure: % of shipments auto-booked, % of invoices auto-matched, % of status updates automated.
  • Benchmarks: The best-performing TMSs automate 50–70%+ of routine transactions.

5. Data Quality & Reporting Latency

  • Why it matters: S&OP, inventory, and customer service depend on reliable ETAs.
  • How to measure: Average latency of status updates (instant vs minutes vs hours), % of shipments with complete milestone data.
  • Benchmarks: Top systems achieve sub-hour reporting latency on key milestones.

6. Total Cost Transparency

License fees are only half the picture.

  • Why it matters: Implementation, carrier fees, API costs, and change requests add up. A “cheap” system can become expensive over five years.
  • How to measure: Ask vendors to model five-year TCO, including onboarding, integration, and expected support costs.
  • Benchmarks: Cloud-native SaaS systems tend to offer more predictable TCO than on-premise or heavily customized legacy suites.

TMS Vendor Landscape — and Where to Look

There are several credible options in the European market:

  • Transporeon (long-standing network with deep carrier integrations)
  • Alpega (strong for multi-national complex shippers)
  • Blue Yonder (enterprise supply chain suite with TMS component)
  • Oracle NetSuite/Infor/SAP modules (robust & expensive but slower to deploy)
  • Cargoson (cloud-native, lighter-weight and fast to onboard, gaining popularity among mid-sized European manufacturers, but not suitable for 3PL/4PL and is still a young company)

Read more: Transport Management software providers

👉 The point of an RFP is not to crown a “winner” from the start. Instead, these metrics let you compare apples with apples. And while some vendors excel in network depth, others in usability or agility, the subtle differentiator often comes down to how fast and painlessly you can actually get to value.


TL;DR: What to Ask in a Transport Management RFP?

Features change, buzzwords evolve, but these six metrics stay relevant. They cut through sales demos and put the focus back where it belongs:

  • Will your carriers connect quickly?
  • Will your team adopt the tool?
  • Will you see ROI within quarters, not years?

Put these questions at the center of your RFP, and you’ll not only select a system, but you’ll also future-proof your transport operations.

Read more

The €2.5 Billion Automation Paradox: How European Shippers Can Close the TMS Automation Gap Before AI-Powered Competitors Leave Manual Operations Behind

The €2.5 Billion Automation Paradox: How European Shippers Can Close the TMS Automation Gap Before AI-Powered Competitors Leave Manual Operations Behind

European shippers are about to face a massive decision. Only 17% of companies report being fully automated, while over one-third still rely heavily on manual processes according to Descartes' 9th Annual Global Transportation Management Benchmark Survey of more than 600 companies. Meanwhile, their AI-powered competitors are pulling ahead at

By Axel Brenner
The European Shipper's Capacity Crisis Playbook: How Advanced Freight Visibility Transforms Scarce Transport Resources Into Strategic Advantage in 2025's Tight Market

The European Shipper's Capacity Crisis Playbook: How Advanced Freight Visibility Transforms Scarce Transport Resources Into Strategic Advantage in 2025's Tight Market

European manufacturers face an unprecedented transport challenge entering 2025. January 2025 saw a spike in freight offers on the Trans.eu platform, with volume increasing on 14 of 16 key lanes. On some routes, the month-over-month growth exceeded 100%. But carrier activity moved in the opposite direction - dropping both

By Axel Brenner
From Basic Reports to Strategic Intelligence: How European Shippers Can Transform TMS Data into Business Intelligence Dashboards That Drive Real ROI

From Basic Reports to Strategic Intelligence: How European Shippers Can Transform TMS Data into Business Intelligence Dashboards That Drive Real ROI

Last quarter's board meeting should have been a wake-up call. Your CFO presented the annual transport spend analysis: €2.4 million flowing through carriers, yet basic reports showed only cost breakdowns and on-time percentages. When pressed for strategic insights about carrier optimization, route efficiency, or cost levers, the

By Axel Brenner